Article explaining the legal obligations associated with occupying Gaza

by Travis Normand
August 29, 2025

The following article does a pretty good job explaining the considerations and legal obligations associated with occupation and moving the civilian population.

Israel is planning to conquer Gaza City – what legal obligations will that incur?
By Jeremy Sharon, posted on August 22, 2025, at 12:05 pm and Updated at 1:21 pm, here: TimesofIsrael.com (or https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-is-planning-to-conquer-gaza-city-what-legal-obligations-will-that-incur/)

Additionally, the following is a “podcast” discussion from the Daily Briefing (Times of Israel) with host Amanda Borschel-Dan and legal and settlements reporter Jeremy Sharon.

Daily Briefing Aug. 10: Day 674 – What would Israel’s legal duties be in a Gaza City takeover?
With Amanda Borschel-Dan and Jeremy Sharon, posted on August 10, 2025, here: TimesofIsrael.com (or https://www.timesofisrael.com/daily-briefing-aug-10-day-674-what-would-israels-legal-duties-be-in-a-gaza-city-takeover/)

Articles on Hamas and Gaza

by Travis Normand
August 8, 2025

I found the following articles this past week and consider them all a “must read.”

“The Secret System Hamas Uses to Pay Government Salaries”
Posted August 6, 2025 by Rushdi Abualouf at BBC.com

“Gaza is a War; Just a War”
Posted July 15, 2025 by Andrew Fox at MrAndrewFox.substack.com

“How the Israeli government is missing the chance to defeat Hamas – opinion”
Posted August 4, 2025 by Amos Yadlin at JPost.com

“Hamas Wants Gaza to Starve”
Posted July 31, 2025 by Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib at TheAtlantic.com

New Article on Proportionality

by Travis Normand
August 8, 2025

For those who want a better understanding of the principle of Proportionality, please check out the following paper that was posted at the “International Law Studies – US Naval War College” page HERE.

The article is:

Proportionality: Can’t Live With It, But Can’t Live Without It
by Geoffrey S. Corn

Abstract:

“Perhaps no other word in the international humanitarian law lexicon evokes more interest and emotion than proportionality. How States implement the rule of proportionality is perhaps the most hotly debated aspect of international humanitarian law. The indeterminate nature of the rule allows for its meaning to conform to whatever its reader wants it to mean. This is a consequence of the variables related to key provisions of the rule: How do we assess military advantage? What makes an anticipated military advantage “concrete and direct”? And most problematic of all, what is the meaning of the term “excessive”? All of these concerns raise troubling questions. Can the proportionality rule truly matter without consensus on what amounts to non-compliance? Does the rule’s indeterminacy undermine its value as a legal tool? This essay will consider several aspects of the proportionality rule: first, why it still reflects a critically important principle of military operations despite its indeterminacy; second, its limited operational efficacy as a civilian risk mitigation measure; and third, why shifting the focus to the principle of constant care and the subordinate rule of precautions in the attack will advance the humanitarian interests of the law.”

Download the article in PDF format HERE.

Great article at MilitaryTimes.com regarding Command Responsibility and Optional Law of War Training

by Travis Normand
May 19, 2025

I found the following opinion piece over at MilitaryTimes.com and thought it was great, so I figured I would share it / repost it here. I couldn’t agree more with the basic theme of the article which is that law of war training should not be optional for the military. This applies to so many things in life, as more training and education is never a bad thing, especially when it relates directly to your job as as an officer or soldier in the military.

Making law of war training optional is a recipe for disaster
by Geoffrey S. Corn
Friday, May 16, 2025
Posted at MilitaryTimes.com

For more, you can click the following link to read about “Command Responsibility” (see Yamashita standard) which is alluded to in the opinion piece above.

See also U.S. Supreme Court (4 February 1946), Application of Yamashita, 327 U.S. 1 (1946) [full text of the opinion]

Current Cease Fire “Deal” to Gaza War (as of May 7, 2024)

by Travis Normand
May 7, 2024

I found the following article that lays out, in basic terms, the current cease fire deal to the “Gaza War” (that started on Oct. 7, 2023). This is the “deal” that is currently on the table, and is apparently supported by Hamas but not by Israel. I am posting this so that you can read the basic terms of the proposed agreement. However, I am not sharing my opinions on the deal or any side of the current armed conflict.

What’s in the three-phase ceasefire deal Hamas backs, but Israel does not?
By Reuters May 7, 2024, 4:29 AM CDT
Posted on Reuters.com: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/three-phase-ceasefire-deal-hamas-backs-israel-does-not-2024-05-06/
(Reporting by Andrew Mills in Doha and Nafisa Eltahir and Nidal al-Mughrabi in Cairo and Tala Ramadan in Dubai; Editing by Edmund Blair, Josie Kao, Michael Georgy and Alison Williams)

Study on Legality of Israeli Occupation of the Palestinian Territory

by Travis Normand
December 6, 2023

While doing some research for a previous post, I stumbled upon the following document:

“Study on the Legality of the Israeli Occupation of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Including East Jerusalem,” by Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, United Nations, 2023; and found online here: https://www.un.org/unispal/document/ceirpp-legal-study2023/

I haven’t read the document yet, but figured I would post it here as I like to share things I find in the event anyone else finds them useful.

U.S. DOJ Files Charges Under U.S. War Crimes Law

by Travis Normand
December 6, 2023

This post is about the herein referenced charges filed by the U.S. Department of Justice. However, it this post also contains information about the status of the Defendants in an armed conflict. The second-part of the post, related to the Defendants’ status, was included due to the terminology used to describe the Defendants in the articles below.

(Part 1): U.S. DOJ Files Charges Under U.S. War Crimes Law:

Apparently the U.S. Department of Justice has filed charges under a U.S. war crimes law that was passed in 1996 (the War Crimes Act of 1996). According to the DOJ, this is the first time charges have been filed using this law. While I imagine this is purely a political move of some kind or another, I don’t really discuss politics on this blog (or at least, I don’t discuss them directly; and I try not to speculate).

In any event, I have posted several articles below as well as a short synopsis of each article. I have also included a link to the indictment, which can be read HERE.

Continue reading

Queen Rania’s Comments on Human Shields

Jordan’s Queen Rania appeared on CNN and had the following comments (see the text of her comments and/or the video, posted below; with these specific comments starting at about the 5:00 minute mark of the video):

“These evacuation orders, I do not believe are for the benefit of the Gaza civiliians. They are not the target audience; the rest of the world is. It is Israel’s attempt to try to legitimize their actions.”

And when it comes to human shields, I think we need to defer to international law. Of course, the use of human shields is criminal. But even if one side uses … puts a civilian in harms way, that civilian is still entitled to full protection under international humanitarian law. That is the global standard and no nation is exempt. So before firing any bullet, before dropping any bomb, it is the responsibility of the nation to weigh the risk to civilian life, and if that risk is disproportionate to the military target then it is deemed unlawful. And frankly, I find it really outrageous when Israeli officials audaciously dismiss Palestinian casualties as human shields. In a place like Jabalia, which is one of the most crowded corners of Gaza; Gaza being one of the most densely populated spots on Earth … civilian death is not is not incidental, it is not accidental. It is a foregone conclusion, and that makes it a war crime.

Comments by Queen Rania of Jordan during interview with CNN’s Becky Anderson; posted to Twitter / “X” on November 5, 2023; see @BeckyCNN (these specific remarks start at about the 5:00 minute mark of the video).
Continue reading

Is the current conflict between Israel and Hamas a NIAC or IAC?

by Travis Normand
November 7, 2023

This is a summary of (some) the substance found in two other articles, one of which I have posted/shared previously. You can find both of these articles, in their entirety, posted here:

The article by Ken Watkin dives into a lot of interesting topics (including whether this conflict could be classified as an IAC; depending on the degree of support, if any, Iran is providing to Hamas); but my point here in this post is to examine the question of whether the current conflict between Israel and Hamas is a NIAC or IAC. I am doing so by summarizing what is in the two articles posted above.

Continue reading